FirstWish掲示板
(現在 過去ログ783 を表示中)
HOME HELP 新規作成 トピック表示 記事検索 過去ログ

<一覧表示に戻る
記事No.4820270 [kgSrMoCIkvwKVKQ] 返信ページ
(幅が未指定のため 1- に指定) スレッド内ページ移動 / << [1-0] >>


スレッドリスト / - / レスフォームへ移動
■4820270  kgSrMoCIkvwKVKQ 
□投稿者/ Virgil -(2016/11/25(Fri) 13:24:38) [ID:qhmApe5w]
http://www.jssports.com.au/isotretinoin-cost-without-insurance-2013.pdf
親記事
引用

Through friends http://www.jssports.com.au/minoxidil-ampuan-fiyat.pdf#albert donde comprar minoxidil 2 en mexico The Bucs, who have scored two offensive touchdowns all season, gained 128 yards in their first two possessions and came out with three points because of a missed field goal and a bad red zone series. They had their hands on two possible TDs and missed on three fourth-down conversions. And while Josh Freeman looked better early, he hung out a pass in the flat that former Buc Aqib Talib picked off with 11 seconds left in the half, and the Pats converted that into a field goal for a 17-3 lead at halftime.
http://www.sixsentix.com/benefits-of-zyrexin.pdf zyrexin yohimbe If the decision goes against the banks, it could open thedoor to many more cases being brought against the industry bycompanies citing Libor manipulation, opening banks up tocompensation claims worth billions of pounds.
http://www.annekairelandvideography.co.uk/rogaine-coupon-printable-2013.pdf how much does rogaine cost at costco Regulators are likely to take a deep look at the firms' bean processing operations in Europe, by far the biggest region for grinding beans to make butter and powder that go into chocolate bars and cookies.
http://thousandcandles.com.au/cheap-purchase-vaso-ultra.pdf cheap purchase vaso ultra The main thing I take from this is that the authors don&#8217;t seem to understand what comparative advantage is. (Hint: It&#8217;s NOT the same thing as competitive advantage.) Comparative advantage refers to the ability to produce at lower opportunity cost. There are two ways to have a comparative advantage- be good at producing something or be bad at producing other things. The Korean comparative advantage that the authors refer to is likely a little from column A and a little from column B. The authors also seem to be using &#8220;economy&#8221; and &#8220;producers&#8221; interchangeably, as in &#8220;And Econ 101 never explains how foreign mercantilist practices, like those China is embracing, can hurt the U.S. economy.&#8221; In reality, the economy consists of both producers and consumers, and consumers benefit from the cheap stuff generated as a result of these policies. (Believe me, there are plenty of reasons to be wary of China, but &#8220;they&#8217;re sending us cheap junk&#8221; is not at the top of that list.) I&#8217;m not even sure what to make of the last paragraph except to point out that the gains from trade don&#8217;t really rely on WHY a particular nation has a cost advantage.


スレッドリスト / - / レスフォームへ移動

[!スレッドリスト非表示モード!] スレッド内ページ移動 / << [1-0] >>
返信フォーム

過去ログには返信できません!


HOME HELP 新規作成 トピック表示 記事検索 過去ログ

- I-BOARD -